What can go wrong when insurance policies are not regularly reviewed?


June, 2014 |

Insurance can play an integral part in a well-developed wealth management strategy. It may serve the purpose of income replacement, liquidity for final expenses and estate taxes or the creation of a financial legacy for heirs. However, once insurance policies are purchased they are rarely reviewed, and the unintended consequence may be increased premiums, reduced benefits or inadequate coverage. The primary reason to review policies is to confirm the coverage type and amounts are still sufficient for the intended purpose. Changes to an individual’s financial situation should be assessed within the context of the existing coverage amounts. A review should also be an opportunity to check the pricing of the policies relative to the coverage.

TITLING
Reviewing insurance plans helps policy owners avoid issues that may arise which may impact the intended outcome. For example, it is common for policies to be purchased with the intention of having an irrevocable life insurance trust (ILIT) as the policy owner. This strategy avoids including the proceeds in the decedent insured gross estate, where they are subject to estate taxes. However, frequently those policies have not been assigned to the ILIT and instead have the insured listed as owner. As a result, what should have been tax-free proceeds to the ILIT wind up diminished by the effects of estate taxes. But even if the policies have been correctly transferred to a trust as owner, in some instances we see the insured mistakenly paying the premiums from their personal accounts. This simple act of paying the premiums with personal assets may be viewed as an “incidence of ownership,” again causing the ultimate proceeds to be included in the decedent’s gross estate, and therefore making them subject to taxation.

SUSTAINABILITY OF PREMIUMS
Titling is not the only aspect to assess when reviewing insurance policies: Insurance companies calculate the premiums for policies based on factors like assumed rates of return. Over time, these rates used in policy illustrations may change—which is prevalent given the interest-rate environment of recent years. Why is this important? If insurers cannot continuously meet or exceed the rates used in their pricing illustrations, the insured may have to absorb the additional cost required to maintain the policy. Increased premiums, particularly as the insured ages and the cost of insurance rises, can become a burden to maintaining the policy. In some instances this burden forces the insured to reduce the death benefit, and in turn the premium amounts, to keep them viable. For this reason, it is important to periodically request in-force illustrations from the insurer. This “check-up” confirms the policy is in good financial shape and the premiums are sufficient for maintaining coverage given current assumptions. Check-ups help avoid the surprise of increased premiums, or at worst, prepare for them.

POLICY LOANS
A frequent issue we see when policies are not periodically reviewed is the presence of a policy loan. When policies build cash value, some individuals choose to have the premiums paid against the value. In some instances, if the policy owner forgets to make the annual premium payment, the policy may automatically borrow against the cash value to pay the premium and keep the policy in force. The danger is that, over time, if this happens repeatedly, the policy loan erodes a substantial portion of the policy, and the ultimate death benefit is less than the insured had intended, and an even bigger surprise to their heirs. Though often neglected after the initial purchase, policy reviews provide the peace of mind that the cover-age and cost are still appropriate within a family’s financial blueprint.

Click here to download PDF: What can go wrong when insurance policies are not regularly reviewed

Mike Kazakewich

Partner / Advisor / Director of Planning, (CRPC®), (CFP®) Michael (Mike) Kazakewich is a Partner, Advisor, and Director of Planning Officer of Coastal Bridge Advisors with over 17 years’ experience in the wealth management industry. Acting as Chief Planning Officer, Mike is responsible for leading the firms’ customized financial planning efforts with a focus on asset …

Mike Kazakewich full bio >

Coastal Bridge Advisors has been named the Best Private Wealth Manager Under $5B by Private Asset Management

Learn More >https://www.coastalbridgeadvisors.com/coastal-bridge-advisors-wins-prominent-industry-award-for-best-private-wealth-manager-under-5b-2/